Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Central Board of Secondary Education v. Aditya Bandopadhyay

(2011) 8 SCC 497 · Supreme Court of India · Right to information

At a glance

  • Citation: (2011) 8 SCC 497
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Right to information
  • In one line: Yes. Evaluated answer sheets are information and must be shown.

1 Facts

Students sought copies of their evaluated answer sheets.

2 Issue

Can students access answer sheets under RTI?

3 What the court decided

Yes. Evaluated answer sheets are information and must be shown.

4 Why it matters

Important for students.

5 Think about it

What exemptions might apply?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Right to information

  • Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2020) 5 SCC 481
  • Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. Central Information Commissioner (2013) 1 SCC 212
  • Thalappalam Service Co-operative Bank v. State of Kerala (2013) 16 SCC 82

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.Central Inland Water Transport Corporation v. Brojo Nath Ganguly →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.