Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Thalappalam Service Co-operative Bank v. State of Kerala

(2013) 16 SCC 82 · Supreme Court of India · Right to information

At a glance

  • Citation: (2013) 16 SCC 82
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Right to information
  • In one line: Not unless substantially financed or controlled by the government.

1 Facts

Cooperative societies resisted RTI.

2 Issue

Are cooperative societies public authorities?

3 What the court decided

Not unless substantially financed or controlled by the government.

4 Why it matters

Defines who RTI applies to.

5 Think about it

What is 'substantial financing'?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Right to information

  • Central Board of Secondary Education v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011) 8 SCC 497
  • Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2020) 5 SCC 481
  • Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. Central Information Commissioner (2013) 1 SCC 212

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of IndiaTomaso Bruno v. State of Uttar Pradesh →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.