Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. Central Information Commissioner

(2013) 1 SCC 212 · Supreme Court of India · Right to information

At a glance

  • Citation: (2013) 1 SCC 212
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Right to information
  • In one line: No. It is personal information exempt unless larger public interest is shown.

1 Facts

An applicant sought a government employee's service records and tax returns.

2 Issue

Is such information disclosable?

3 What the court decided

No. It is personal information exempt unless larger public interest is shown.

4 Why it matters

Limits RTI for personal data.

5 Think about it

How does the DPDP Act affect RTI?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Right to information

  • Central Board of Secondary Education v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011) 8 SCC 497
  • Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2020) 5 SCC 481
  • Thalappalam Service Co-operative Bank v. State of Kerala (2013) 16 SCC 82

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Gideon v. WainwrightGitha Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.