LANDMARK CASE

Medha Kotwal Lele v. Union of India

(2013) 1 SCC 297 · Supreme Court of India · Labour law

At a glance

Citation: (2013) 1 SCC 297
Court: Supreme Court of India
Area of law: Labour law
In one line: Directions were issued for complaint committees and enforcement.

1 Facts

Women's groups reported poor implementation of the Vishaka guidelines.

2 Issue

How must workplaces implement the guidelines?

3 What the court decided

Directions were issued for complaint committees and enforcement.

4 Why it matters

Bridged Vishaka and the POSH Act.

5 Think about it

Why did implementation fail?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

7 More cases on Labour law

Apparel Export Promotion Council v. A.K. Chopra (1999) 1 SCC 759
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India (1984) 3 SCC 161
Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa (1978) 2 SCC 213
Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India (1995) 3 SCC 42
Delhi Transport Corporation v. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress 1991 Supp (1) SCC 600
People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India (Asiad Workers) (1982) 3 SCC 235

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← McDowell and Co. v. Commercial Tax Officer Minerva Mills v. Union of India →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.