Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya

AIR 1959 SC 781 · Supreme Court of India · Contract law

At a glance

  • Citation: AIR 1959 SC 781
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Contract law
  • In one line: No. Wagers are void but not illegal, so collateral agreements are enforceable.

1 Facts

Partners shared losses from wagering transactions.

2 Issue

Is an agreement collateral to a wager illegal?

3 What the court decided

No. Wagers are void but not illegal, so collateral agreements are enforceable.

4 Why it matters

Clarifies void versus illegal.

5 Think about it

Why does the difference matter?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Contract law

  • Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. Girdharilal Parshottamdas AIR 1966 SC 543
  • Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1893] 1 QB 256
  • Central Inland Water Transport Corporation v. Brojo Nath Ganguly (1986) 3 SCC 156
  • Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (2017) 14 SCC 80
  • Fateh Chand v. Balkishan Dass AIR 1963 SC 1405
  • Felthouse v. Bindley (1862) 11 CB (NS) 869

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of DelhiGian Singh v. State of Punjab →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.