LANDMARK CASE
Fateh Chand v. Balkishan Dass
AIR 1963 SC 1405 · Supreme Court of India · Contract law
At a glance
- Citation: AIR 1963 SC 1405
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Contract law
- In one line: No. Only reasonable compensation up to the stipulated sum.
1 Facts
A buyer forfeited money paid under a sale agreement.
2 Issue
Can a stipulated sum be recovered automatically?
3 What the court decided
No. Only reasonable compensation up to the stipulated sum.
4 Why it matters
Foundation of Section 74 law.
5 Think about it
Is the penalty and liquidated damages distinction relevant in India?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Contract law
- Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. Girdharilal Parshottamdas AIR 1966 SC 543
- Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1893] 1 QB 256
- Central Inland Water Transport Corporation v. Brojo Nath Ganguly (1986) 3 SCC 156
- Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (2017) 14 SCC 80
- Felthouse v. Bindley (1862) 11 CB (NS) 869
- Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya AIR 1959 SC 781
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Excel Crop Care v. Competition Commission of IndiaFelthouse v. Bindley →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.