Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India

(1990) 1 SCC 613 · Supreme Court of India · Torts

At a glance

  • Citation: (1990) 1 SCC 613
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Torts
  • In one line: The Act was upheld under the parens patriae doctrine.

1 Facts

The Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster Act made the government the sole representative of victims.

2 Issue

Is the Act valid?

3 What the court decided

The Act was upheld under the parens patriae doctrine.

4 Why it matters

It approved the state acting for victims.

5 Think about it

What is parens patriae?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Torts

  • Ashby v. White (1703) 2 Ld Raym 938
  • Caparo Industries v. Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605
  • Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] AC 562
  • Gloucester Grammar School Case (1410) YB 11 Hen IV
  • Hedley Byrne and Co. v. Heller and Partners [1964] AC 465
  • Kasturilal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1965 SC 1039

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh KushwahaChebrolu Leela Prasad Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.