Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Ashby v. White

(1703) 2 Ld Raym 938 · Court of King's Bench (UK) · Torts

At a glance

  • Citation: (1703) 2 Ld Raym 938
  • Court: Court of King's Bench (UK)
  • Area of law: Torts
  • In one line: Yes. Injuria sine damno: violation of a legal right is actionable.

1 Facts

A voter was wrongly prevented from voting, though his candidate won.

2 Issue

Is there a remedy without actual loss?

3 What the court decided

Yes. Injuria sine damno: violation of a legal right is actionable.

4 Why it matters

The classic case for injuria sine damno.

5 Think about it

Why does the law give remedies without loss?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Torts

  • Caparo Industries v. Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605
  • Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India (1990) 1 SCC 613
  • Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] AC 562
  • Gloucester Grammar School Case (1410) YB 11 Hen IV
  • Hedley Byrne and Co. v. Heller and Partners [1964] AC 465
  • Kasturilal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1965 SC 1039

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of IndiaAshoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.