LANDMARK CASE
Ashby v. White
(1703) 2 Ld Raym 938 · Court of King's Bench (UK) · Torts
At a glance
- Citation: (1703) 2 Ld Raym 938
- Court: Court of King's Bench (UK)
- Area of law: Torts
- In one line: Yes. Injuria sine damno: violation of a legal right is actionable.
1 Facts
A voter was wrongly prevented from voting, though his candidate won.
2 Issue
Is there a remedy without actual loss?
3 What the court decided
Yes. Injuria sine damno: violation of a legal right is actionable.
4 Why it matters
The classic case for injuria sine damno.
5 Think about it
Why does the law give remedies without loss?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Torts
- Caparo Industries v. Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605
- Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India (1990) 1 SCC 613
- Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] AC 562
- Gloucester Grammar School Case (1410) YB 11 Hen IV
- Hedley Byrne and Co. v. Heller and Partners [1964] AC 465
- Kasturilal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1965 SC 1039
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of IndiaAshoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.