LANDMARK CASE

Chebrolu Leela Prasad Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh

(2021) 11 SCC 401 · Supreme Court of India · Constitutional law

At a glance

Citation: (2021) 11 SCC 401
Court: Supreme Court of India
Area of law: Constitutional law
In one line: No. It was struck down as unreasonable.

1 Facts

An order reserved 100 percent of teacher posts in scheduled areas for STs.

2 Issue

Is 100 percent reservation valid?

3 What the court decided

No. It was struck down as unreasonable.

4 Why it matters

Important for the limits of reservation.

5 Think about it

Why is 100 percent reservation different?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

7 More cases on Constitutional law

A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
Air India v. Nergesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008) 3 SCC 1
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar (Shirur Mutt) →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.