LANDMARK CASE
Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma
(2020) 9 SCC 1 · Supreme Court of India · Family law
At a glance
- Citation: (2020) 9 SCC 1
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Family law
- In one line: No. Daughters are coparceners by birth, and the father need not be alive on the amendment date.
1 Facts
Conflicting decisions existed on whether daughters got coparcenary rights if the father died before the 2005 amendment.
2 Issue
Does a daughter's right as a coparcener depend on the father being alive on 9 September 2005?
3 What the court decided
No. Daughters are coparceners by birth, and the father need not be alive on the amendment date.
4 Why it matters
It secured equal coparcenary rights for daughters.
5 Think about it
Why does 'by birth' matter so much for coparcenary rights?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Family law
- ABC v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2015) 10 SCC 1
- Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) 8 SCC 746
- Badshah v. Urmila Badshah Godse (2014) 1 SCC 188
- Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia (1979) 2 SCC 316
- Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha (2011) 1 SCC 141
- D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010) 10 SCC 469
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Vineet Narain v. Union of IndiaVirsa Singh v. State of Punjab →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.