Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal

(2010) 10 SCC 469 · Supreme Court of India · Family law

At a glance

  • Citation: (2010) 10 SCC 469
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Family law
  • In one line: The Court listed conditions, such as holding out as spouses and living together for a significant period.

1 Facts

A woman claimed maintenance as a wife from a man in a relationship with her.

2 Issue

When is a relationship 'in the nature of marriage' under the DV Act?

3 What the court decided

The Court listed conditions, such as holding out as spouses and living together for a significant period.

4 Why it matters

Key case for live in rights.

5 Think about it

Why did the Court limit protection?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Family law

  • ABC v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2015) 10 SCC 1
  • Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) 8 SCC 746
  • Badshah v. Urmila Badshah Godse (2014) 1 SCC 188
  • Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia (1979) 2 SCC 316
  • Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha (2011) 1 SCC 141
  • Danamma v. Amar (2018) 3 SCC 343

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of IndiaD.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.