Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Satyam Infoway v. Sifynet Solutions

(2004) 6 SCC 145 · Supreme Court of India · Intellectual property

At a glance

  • Citation: (2004) 6 SCC 145
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Intellectual property
  • In one line: Yes. Domain names are protected, and passing off applies.

1 Facts

Two companies used the domain name 'Sify'.

2 Issue

Are domain names protected like trademarks?

3 What the court decided

Yes. Domain names are protected, and passing off applies.

4 Why it matters

Key case on domain names.

5 Think about it

How do you protect a website name?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Intellectual property

  • Amar Nath Sehgal v. Union of India (2005) 30 PTC 253 (Del)
  • Cadila Health Care v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals (2001) 5 SCC 73
  • Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak (2008) 1 SCC 1
  • Indian Performing Right Society v. Eastern Indian Motion Pictures Association (1977) 2 SCC 820
  • Novartis AG v. Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 1
  • R.G. Anand v. Delux Films (1978) 4 SCC 118

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur and Co.Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.