LANDMARK CASE

Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank

(2020) 6 SCC 1 · Supreme Court of India · Constitutional law

At a glance

Citation: (2020) 6 SCC 1
Court: Supreme Court of India
Area of law: Constitutional law
In one line: The rules were struck down for lacking independence safeguards.

1 Facts

Rules for tribunal members were made under the Finance Act, 2017.

2 Issue

Were the rules valid?

3 What the court decided

The rules were struck down for lacking independence safeguards.

4 Why it matters

Part of the tribunal reform saga.

5 Think about it

Why do tribunal appointments matter?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

7 More cases on Constitutional law

A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
Air India v. Nergesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008) 3 SCC 1
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Roe v. Wade and Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.