LANDMARK CASE
Rama Murthy v. State of Karnataka
(1997) 2 SCC 642 · Supreme Court of India · Criminal justice
At a glance
- Citation: (1997) 2 SCC 642
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Criminal justice
- In one line: The Court identified problems like overcrowding and delay, and gave directions.
1 Facts
A prisoner complained of conditions in jail.
2 Issue
What prison reforms are needed?
3 What the court decided
The Court identified problems like overcrowding and delay, and gave directions.
4 Why it matters
Early prison reform blueprint.
5 Think about it
Which problems persist?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Criminal justice
- Delhi Domestic Working Women's Forum v. Union of India (1995) 1 SCC 14
- Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81
- Laxmi v. Union of India (2014) 4 SCC 427
- M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1978) 3 SCC 544
- Mahender Chawla v. Union of India (2019) 14 SCC 615
- Prakash Singh v. Union of India (2006) 8 SCC 1
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of BiharRamana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.