Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Delhi Domestic Working Women's Forum v. Union of India

(1995) 1 SCC 14 · Supreme Court of India · Criminal justice

At a glance

  • Citation: (1995) 1 SCC 14
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Criminal justice
  • In one line: Guidelines included legal assistance, anonymity and a compensation board.

1 Facts

Domestic workers were sexually assaulted by army personnel on a train.

2 Issue

What support do rape survivors need?

3 What the court decided

Guidelines included legal assistance, anonymity and a compensation board.

4 Why it matters

An early survivor support framework.

5 Think about it

Which guidelines are now in law?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this caseTrial Advocacy

7 More cases on Criminal justice

  • Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81
  • Laxmi v. Union of India (2014) 4 SCC 427
  • M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1978) 3 SCC 544
  • Mahender Chawla v. Union of India (2019) 14 SCC 615
  • Prakash Singh v. Union of India (2006) 8 SCC 1
  • Prem Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration (1980) 3 SCC 526

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper ConstructionDelhi Transport Corporation v. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.