LANDMARK CASE

Prem Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration

(1980) 3 SCC 526 · Supreme Court of India · Criminal justice

At a glance

Citation: (1980) 3 SCC 526
Court: Supreme Court of India
Area of law: Criminal justice
In one line: No. Handcuffing is permitted only in exceptional cases with recorded reasons.

1 Facts

An undertrial was routinely handcuffed while taken to court.

2 Issue

Is routine handcuffing lawful?

3 What the court decided

No. Handcuffing is permitted only in exceptional cases with recorded reasons.

4 Why it matters

It protects dignity of prisoners.

5 Think about it

When might handcuffing be justified?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

7 More cases on Criminal justice

Delhi Domestic Working Women's Forum v. Union of India (1995) 1 SCC 14
Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81
Laxmi v. Union of India (2014) 4 SCC 427
M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1978) 3 SCC 544
Mahender Chawla v. Union of India (2019) 14 SCC 615
Prakash Singh v. Union of India (2006) 8 SCC 1

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India Public Interest Foundation v. Union of India →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.