LANDMARK CASE

Ram Jethmalani v. Union of India

(2011) 8 SCC 1 · Supreme Court of India · Administrative law

At a glance

Citation: (2011) 8 SCC 1
Court: Supreme Court of India
Area of law: Administrative law
In one line: Yes. The Court formed an SIT and directed disclosure of information to petitioners.

1 Facts

Petitioners sought action on black money stashed abroad.

2 Issue

Should a Special Investigation Team be formed?

3 What the court decided

Yes. The Court formed an SIT and directed disclosure of information to petitioners.

4 Why it matters

An example of court supervised investigation.

5 Think about it

When should courts form SITs?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

7 More cases on Administrative law

Associated Provincial Picture Houses v. Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223
Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India (2012) 3 SCC 1
Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary (Coal Blocks) (2014) 9 SCC 516
Natural Resources Allocation, In re (Special Reference No. 1 of 2012) (2012) 10 SCC 1
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979) 3 SCC 489
State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Balu (2017) 2 SCC 281

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Rajnesh v. Neha Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.