Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

R.D. Upadhyay v. State of Andhra Pradesh

(2007) 15 SCC 337 · Supreme Court of India · Criminal justice

At a glance

  • Citation: (2007) 15 SCC 337
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Criminal justice
  • In one line: Detailed directions covered food, health, education and crèches.

1 Facts

Children were living with their mothers in prisons.

2 Issue

What care must the children of women prisoners receive?

3 What the court decided

Detailed directions covered food, health, education and crèches.

4 Why it matters

Protects children in prisons.

5 Think about it

Should children live in prisons at all?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this caseTrial Advocacy

7 More cases on Criminal justice

  • Delhi Domestic Working Women's Forum v. Union of India (1995) 1 SCC 14
  • Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81
  • Laxmi v. Union of India (2014) 4 SCC 427
  • M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1978) 3 SCC 544
  • Mahender Chawla v. Union of India (2019) 14 SCC 615
  • Prakash Singh v. Union of India (2006) 8 SCC 1

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil NaduR.G. Anand v. Delux Films →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.