Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli

(2006) 4 SCC 558 · Supreme Court of India · Family law

At a glance

  • Citation: (2006) 4 SCC 558
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Family law
  • In one line: Divorce was granted, and the Court recommended irretrievable breakdown as a statutory ground.

1 Facts

A couple had been separated for years with bitter litigation.

2 Issue

Should irretrievable breakdown be a ground for divorce?

3 What the court decided

Divorce was granted, and the Court recommended irretrievable breakdown as a statutory ground.

4 Why it matters

Influenced later Article 142 divorces.

5 Think about it

Why has Parliament not added it?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Family law

  • ABC v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2015) 10 SCC 1
  • Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) 8 SCC 746
  • Badshah v. Urmila Badshah Godse (2014) 1 SCC 188
  • Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia (1979) 2 SCC 316
  • Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha (2011) 1 SCC 141
  • D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010) 10 SCC 469

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Natural Resources Allocation, In re (Special Reference No. 1 of 2012)Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.