Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Lily Thomas v. Union of India (Bigamy by Conversion)

(2000) 6 SCC 224 · Supreme Court of India · Family and criminal law

At a glance

  • Citation: (2000) 6 SCC 224
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Family and criminal law
  • In one line: Yes. It is bigamy under the penal law, following Sarla Mudgal.

1 Facts

Men converted to Islam to marry again without divorcing.

2 Issue

Is the second marriage bigamy?

3 What the court decided

Yes. It is bigamy under the penal law, following Sarla Mudgal.

4 Why it matters

Confirmed the anti bigamy rule.

5 Think about it

How does this protect the first wife?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Life Insurance Corporation v. EscortsLily Thomas v. Union of India (Disqualification of Legislators) →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.