Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Life Insurance Corporation v. Escorts

(1986) 1 SCC 264 · Supreme Court of India · Corporate law

At a glance

  • Citation: (1986) 1 SCC 264
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Corporate law
  • In one line: Only in specific cases such as fraud or where a statute requires it.

1 Facts

LIC sought to change Escorts' board after foreign investors bought shares.

2 Issue

When can the corporate veil be lifted?

3 What the court decided

Only in specific cases such as fraud or where a statute requires it.

4 Why it matters

A leading Indian case on lifting the veil.

5 Think about it

When should courts look behind the company?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Corporate law

  • Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction (1996) 4 SCC 622
  • Salomon v. A. Salomon and Co. Ltd. [1897] AC 22
  • Tata Sons v. Cyrus Investments (2021) 9 SCC 449

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Laxmi v. Union of IndiaLily Thomas v. Union of India (Bigamy by Conversion) →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.