LANDMARK CASE
Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
(1994) 4 SCC 260 · Supreme Court of India · Criminal procedure
At a glance
- Citation: (1994) 4 SCC 260
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Criminal procedure
- In one line: Arrest must be justified, not just lawful. The arrested person has the right to inform a friend or relative.
1 Facts
A lawyer was detained by police for days without proper records.
2 Issue
When can the police arrest a person?
3 What the court decided
Arrest must be justified, not just lawful. The arrested person has the right to inform a friend or relative.
4 Why it matters
It shaped arrest safeguards, later codified.
5 Think about it
Why is the power to arrest different from the need to arrest?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Criminal procedure
- Arnab Manoranjan Goswami v. Union of India (2020) 14 SCC 12
- Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273
- D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) 1 SCC 416
- Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303
- Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
- Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain GuptaJohn Vallamattom v. Union of India →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.