LANDMARK CASE
Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta
(2018) 10 SCC 396 · Supreme Court of India · Constitutional law
At a glance
- Citation: (2018) 10 SCC 396
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Constitutional law
- In one line: No. That requirement in Nagaraj was held contrary to Indra Sawhney, but the creamy layer principle applies to SCs and STs in promotions.
1 Facts
A reference asked whether M. Nagaraj needed reconsideration.
2 Issue
Must the state collect data on the backwardness of SCs and STs for promotion reservation?
3 What the court decided
No. That requirement in Nagaraj was held contrary to Indra Sawhney, but the creamy layer principle applies to SCs and STs in promotions.
4 Why it matters
It refined the law on reservation in promotions.
5 Think about it
Why apply the creamy layer to SCs and STs?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Constitutional law
- A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
- ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
- Air India v. Nergesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
- Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
- Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008) 3 SCC 1
- Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of IndiaJoginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.