Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji

(2018) 5 SCC 379 · Supreme Court of India · Legal profession

At a glance

  • Citation: (2018) 5 SCC 379
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Legal profession
  • In one line: No, except temporary visits for advice on foreign law and international arbitration.

1 Facts

Foreign law firms sought to practise in India.

2 Issue

Can foreign lawyers practise in India?

3 What the court decided

No, except temporary visits for advice on foreign law and international arbitration.

4 Why it matters

Shaped India's legal market.

5 Think about it

How have BCI rules changed since?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Legal profession

  • Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45
  • Indira Jaising v. Secretary General, Supreme Court (2017) 9 SCC 766
  • R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court (2009) 8 SCC 106

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. RajappaBarendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.