LANDMARK CASE
Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji
(2018) 5 SCC 379 · Supreme Court of India · Legal profession
At a glance
- Citation: (2018) 5 SCC 379
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Legal profession
- In one line: No, except temporary visits for advice on foreign law and international arbitration.
1 Facts
Foreign law firms sought to practise in India.
2 Issue
Can foreign lawyers practise in India?
3 What the court decided
No, except temporary visits for advice on foreign law and international arbitration.
4 Why it matters
Shaped India's legal market.
5 Think about it
How have BCI rules changed since?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Legal profession
- Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45
- Indira Jaising v. Secretary General, Supreme Court (2017) 9 SCC 766
- R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court (2009) 8 SCC 106
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. RajappaBarendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.