Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan

(1997) 6 SCC 241 · Supreme Court of India · Gender and labour law

At a glance

  • Citation: (1997) 6 SCC 241
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Gender and labour law
  • In one line: The Court framed binding guidelines, drawing on CEDAW and Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21, to apply until Parliament legislated.

1 Facts

After the gang rape of a social worker in Rajasthan who tried to stop a child marriage, women's groups filed a PIL on workplace sexual harassment.

2 Issue

How should women be protected from sexual harassment at work when there is no law on it?

3 What the court decided

The Court framed binding guidelines, drawing on CEDAW and Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21, to apply until Parliament legislated.

4 Why it matters

The Vishaka guidelines governed for sixteen years and were replaced by the POSH Act, 2013.

5 Think about it

Is it proper for a court to lay down guidelines that work like legislation? When is it justified?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Virsa Singh v. State of PunjabVodafone International Holdings v. Union of India →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.