LANDMARK CASE

Union of India v. R. Gandhi (Madras Bar Association)

(2010) 11 SCC 1 · Supreme Court of India · Constitutional law

At a glance

Citation: (2010) 11 SCC 1
Court: Supreme Court of India
Area of law: Constitutional law
In one line: Tribunals are valid but must meet standards of independence, qualifications and selection.

1 Facts

The creation of the National Company Law Tribunal was challenged.

2 Issue

What standards must tribunals meet?

3 What the court decided

Tribunals are valid but must meet standards of independence, qualifications and selection.

4 Why it matters

Important for tribunal independence.

5 Think about it

Why do tribunal members need judicial independence?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

7 More cases on Constitutional law

A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
Air India v. Nergesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008) 3 SCC 1
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan University of Oxford v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.