LANDMARK CASE
Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi)
(2020) 5 SCC 1 · Supreme Court of India · Criminal procedure
At a glance
- Citation: (2020) 5 SCC 1
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Criminal procedure
- In one line: No. It need not be limited in time and can continue till the end of trial, unless the court decides otherwise.
1 Facts
The question was whether anticipatory bail must be limited in time.
2 Issue
Should anticipatory bail end at a fixed stage?
3 What the court decided
No. It need not be limited in time and can continue till the end of trial, unless the court decides otherwise.
4 Why it matters
It settled the duration of anticipatory bail.
5 Think about it
When might a court still limit it?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Criminal procedure
- Arnab Manoranjan Goswami v. Union of India (2020) 14 SCC 12
- Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273
- D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) 1 SCC 416
- Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303
- Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
- Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Sushil Kumar Sharma v. Union of IndiaSwapnil Tripathi v. Supreme Court of India →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.