LANDMARK CASE
Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India
(1993) 4 SCC 441 · Supreme Court of India · Constitutional law
At a glance
- Citation: (1993) 4 SCC 441
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Constitutional law
- In one line: Consultation means concurrence. The opinion of the Chief Justice, formed collectively with senior judges, has primacy.
1 Facts
The issue of judicial appointments was referred to a larger bench (Second Judges Case).
2 Issue
What does 'consultation' with the Chief Justice mean in appointments?
3 What the court decided
Consultation means concurrence. The opinion of the Chief Justice, formed collectively with senior judges, has primacy.
4 Why it matters
It created the collegium system.
5 Think about it
What are the strengths and criticisms of the collegium?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Constitutional law
- A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
- ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
- Air India v. Nergesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
- Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
- Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008) 3 SCC 1
- Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Superintendent, Central Prison v. Ram Manohar LohiaSupreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India (NJAC) →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.