LANDMARK CASE
State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Narayan Mardikar
(1991) 1 SCC 57 · Supreme Court of India · Criminal law
At a glance
- Citation: (1991) 1 SCC 57
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Criminal law
- In one line: No. Every woman, whatever her character, has a right to privacy and protection.
1 Facts
A police officer accused of misconduct argued the complainant was a woman of easy virtue.
2 Issue
Does a woman's character reduce her right to privacy?
3 What the court decided
No. Every woman, whatever her character, has a right to privacy and protection.
4 Why it matters
An important case on dignity and privacy.
5 Think about it
Why does past conduct not reduce protection?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Criminal law
- Abhayanand Mishra v. State of Bihar AIR 1961 SC 1698
- Amish Devgan v. Union of India (2021) 1 SCC 1
- Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 684
- Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab (1995) 3 SCC 214
- Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor AIR 1925 PC 1
- Basdev v. State of PEPSU AIR 1956 SC 488
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← State of Madras v. Champakam DorairajanState of Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.