LANDMARK CASE

State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal

1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 · Supreme Court of India · Criminal procedure

At a glance

Citation: 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335
Court: Supreme Court of India
Area of law: Criminal procedure
In one line: The Court listed seven categories where quashing is justified, such as when allegations disclose no offence or are malicious.

1 Facts

A former chief minister sought to quash an FIR alleging corruption.

2 Issue

When can a High Court quash an FIR?

3 What the court decided

The Court listed seven categories where quashing is justified, such as when allegations disclose no offence or are malicious.

4 Why it matters

The standard guide for quashing petitions.

5 Think about it

Apply the Bhajan Lal categories to a hypothetical FIR.

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

7 More cases on Criminal procedure

Arnab Manoranjan Goswami v. Union of India (2020) 14 SCC 12
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) 1 SCC 416
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303
Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.