LANDMARK CASE
S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
1981 Supp SCC 87 · Supreme Court of India · Constitutional law
At a glance
- Citation: 1981 Supp SCC 87
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Constitutional law
- In one line: Standing was widened for public interest. Executive primacy in appointments was upheld then, but later reversed.
1 Facts
Lawyers challenged transfers and appointments of judges (First Judges Case).
2 Issue
Who has standing to raise public interest issues, and what is the role of the executive in judicial appointments?
3 What the court decided
Standing was widened for public interest. Executive primacy in appointments was upheld then, but later reversed.
4 Why it matters
It laid the foundation of PIL standing.
5 Think about it
Trace how the Second Judges Case changed the appointment position.
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Constitutional law
- A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
- ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
- Air India v. Nergesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
- Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
- Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008) 3 SCC 1
- Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of IndiaS.R. Bommai v. Union of India →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.