LANDMARK CASE
Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal
(1996) 4 SCC 37 · Supreme Court of India · Medical law
At a glance
- Citation: (1996) 4 SCC 37
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Medical law
- In one line: Yes. Failure of government hospitals to provide timely treatment violated Article 21. Compensation was awarded.
1 Facts
A seriously injured person was refused admission at several government hospitals.
2 Issue
Does the right to life include emergency medical treatment?
3 What the court decided
Yes. Failure of government hospitals to provide timely treatment violated Article 21. Compensation was awarded.
4 Why it matters
It confirmed health care as part of Article 21.
5 Think about it
What duties do government hospitals have?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Medical law
- Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011) 4 SCC 454
- Parmanand Katara v. Union of India (1989) 4 SCC 286
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Parmanand Katara v. Union of IndiaPeople's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.