Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal

(1996) 4 SCC 37 · Supreme Court of India · Medical law

At a glance

  • Citation: (1996) 4 SCC 37
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Medical law
  • In one line: Yes. Failure of government hospitals to provide timely treatment violated Article 21. Compensation was awarded.

1 Facts

A seriously injured person was refused admission at several government hospitals.

2 Issue

Does the right to life include emergency medical treatment?

3 What the court decided

Yes. Failure of government hospitals to provide timely treatment violated Article 21. Compensation was awarded.

4 Why it matters

It confirmed health care as part of Article 21.

5 Think about it

What duties do government hospitals have?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Medical law

  • Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011) 4 SCC 454
  • Parmanand Katara v. Union of India (1989) 4 SCC 286

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Parmanand Katara v. Union of IndiaPeople's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.