LANDMARK CASE
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
376 U.S. 254 (1964) · Supreme Court of the United States · Media law
At a glance
- Citation: 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
- Court: Supreme Court of the United States
- Area of law: Media law
- In one line: Only if they prove 'actual malice': knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth.
1 Facts
A public official sued the newspaper for an advertisement with minor factual errors about police conduct.
2 Issue
When can public officials win defamation suits?
3 What the court decided
Only if they prove 'actual malice': knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth.
4 Why it matters
Influenced R. Rajagopal in India.
5 Think about it
Why protect even some false statements about officials?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Media law
- Sahara India Real Estate Corporation v. SEBI (2012) 10 SCC 603
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of DelhiNilabati Behera v. State of Orissa →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.