Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

376 U.S. 254 (1964) · Supreme Court of the United States · Media law

At a glance

  • Citation: 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
  • Court: Supreme Court of the United States
  • Area of law: Media law
  • In one line: Only if they prove 'actual malice': knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth.

1 Facts

A public official sued the newspaper for an advertisement with minor factual errors about police conduct.

2 Issue

When can public officials win defamation suits?

3 What the court decided

Only if they prove 'actual malice': knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth.

4 Why it matters

Influenced R. Rajagopal in India.

5 Think about it

Why protect even some false statements about officials?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Media law

  • Sahara India Real Estate Corporation v. SEBI (2012) 10 SCC 603

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of DelhiNilabati Behera v. State of Orissa →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.