LANDMARK CASE
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India
(2000) 10 SCC 664 · Supreme Court of India · Environmental law
At a glance
- Citation: (2000) 10 SCC 664
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Environmental law
- In one line: Construction was allowed to continue, with conditions on rehabilitation.
1 Facts
Activists challenged construction of the Sardar Sarovar dam over displacement and environmental harm.
2 Issue
Should the dam be stopped?
3 What the court decided
Construction was allowed to continue, with conditions on rehabilitation.
4 Why it matters
An important case on courts and large projects.
5 Think about it
How far should courts review policy decisions?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Environmental law
- A.P. Pollution Control Board v. Prof. M.V. Nayudu (1999) 2 SCC 718
- Arjun Gopal v. Union of India (2017) 1 SCC 412
- Centre for Environmental Law, WWF India v. Union of India (Asiatic Lion) (2013) 8 SCC 234
- Hinch Lal Tiwari v. Kamala Devi (2001) 6 SCC 496
- Indian Council for Enviro Legal Action v. Union of India (1996) 3 SCC 212
- Lafarge Umiam Mining v. Union of India (2011) 7 SCC 338
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. DaniNathulal v. State of Madhya Pradesh →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.