LANDMARK CASE

Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka

(1992) 3 SCC 666 · Supreme Court of India · Constitutional law

At a glance

Citation: (1992) 3 SCC 666
Court: Supreme Court of India
Area of law: Constitutional law
In one line: Yes, under Article 21, and capitation fees were held arbitrary.

1 Facts

A student challenged high capitation fees in private medical colleges.

2 Issue

Is there a right to education?

3 What the court decided

Yes, under Article 21, and capitation fees were held arbitrary.

4 Why it matters

Refined in Unni Krishnan the next year.

5 Think about it

Why did Unni Krishnan limit this right?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

7 More cases on Constitutional law

A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
Air India v. Nergesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008) 3 SCC 1
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.