Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. Chief Minister, Maharashtra

(2021) 8 SCC 1 · Supreme Court of India · Constitutional law

At a glance

  • Citation: (2021) 8 SCC 1
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Constitutional law
  • In one line: No. There were no extraordinary circumstances to breach the 50 percent ceiling.

1 Facts

Maharashtra granted reservation to Marathas, exceeding 50 percent.

2 Issue

Was the Maratha reservation valid?

3 What the court decided

No. There were no extraordinary circumstances to breach the 50 percent ceiling.

4 Why it matters

It reaffirmed Indra Sawhney's ceiling.

5 Think about it

What counts as extraordinary circumstances?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Constitutional law

  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
  • ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
  • Air India v. Nergesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
  • Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
  • Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008) 3 SCC 1
  • Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Jacob Mathew v. State of PunjabJanhit Abhiyan v. Union of India →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.