Jurisence
Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Skills About Podcast Academy soon Opportunities soon

LANDMARK CASE

Indian Express Newspapers v. Union of India

(1985) 1 SCC 641 · Supreme Court of India · Constitutional law

At a glance

  • Citation: (1985) 1 SCC 641
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Area of law: Constitutional law
  • In one line: Taxes are allowed but must not be excessive so as to curb circulation; the government was told to reconsider.

1 Facts

Newspapers challenged import duty on newsprint.

2 Issue

Can taxes on newsprint violate freedom of the press?

3 What the court decided

Taxes are allowed but must not be excessive so as to curb circulation; the government was told to reconsider.

4 Why it matters

It recognised the press's role in democracy.

5 Think about it

When does a tax become a restriction on speech?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

How to analyse a judgmentHow to cite this case

7 More cases on Constitutional law

  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
  • ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
  • Air India v. Nergesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
  • Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
  • Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008) 3 SCC 1
  • Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Indian Council for Enviro Legal Action v. Union of IndiaIndian Hotel and Restaurant Association v. State of Maharashtra →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.

Jurisence

The Algorithm for Next-Gen Legal Minds

Explore

Home AI Legal Hub Advocacy Lab Study Materials Word of the Day Case of the Day Weekly Quiz My Jurisence Podcast Skill Roadmaps About

Legal

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Disclaimer

Connect

Contact Instagram Threads Facebook LinkedIn

© Jurisence. All rights reserved.

Educational content only — not legal advice.