LANDMARK CASE
E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu
(1974) 4 SCC 3 · Supreme Court of India · Constitutional law
At a glance
- Citation: (1974) 4 SCC 3
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Area of law: Constitutional law
- In one line: The petition failed, but the Court held that equality is antithetical to arbitrariness.
1 Facts
A senior officer challenged his transfer to a post he considered inferior.
2 Issue
What is the scope of equality under Article 14?
3 What the court decided
The petition failed, but the Court held that equality is antithetical to arbitrariness.
4 Why it matters
It introduced the arbitrariness doctrine under Article 14.
5 Think about it
How did this idea develop into manifest arbitrariness later?
6 Analyse it yourself
Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.
7 More cases on Constitutional law
- A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
- ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
- Air India v. Nergesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
- Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
- Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008) 3 SCC 1
- Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637
All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz
← Donoghue v. StevensonEastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak →
A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.