LANDMARK CASE

Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat

(2001) 3 SCC 1 · Supreme Court of India · Evidence

At a glance

Citation: (2001) 3 SCC 1
Court: Supreme Court of India
Area of law: Evidence
In one line: Note the objection, mark the evidence tentatively and decide at the end, except for stamp duty objections.

1 Facts

Trials were delayed because each objection to evidence was decided immediately.

2 Issue

How should courts deal with evidentiary objections?

3 What the court decided

Note the objection, mark the evidence tentatively and decide at the end, except for stamp duty objections.

4 Why it matters

It speeds up trials.

5 Think about it

Why are stamp duty objections handled differently?

6 Analyse it yourself

Read the full judgment from an official source or a law database, then brief it in seven steps: facts, issues, arguments, decision, ratio, obiter and significance. Always check the citation before you rely on it.

7 More cases on Evidence

Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer (2014) 10 SCC 473
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020) 7 SCC 1
Pakala Narayana Swami v. Emperor AIR 1939 PC 47
Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018) 2 SCC 801
State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad AIR 1961 SC 1808
Tahsildar Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1959 SC 1012

All 366 landmark cases · Today's Case of the Day · Weekly quiz

← Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Cricket Association of Bihar →

A short teaching summary for students. Educational content only, not legal advice.